Consequences of Discontinuing a 4/6 Cyclin D-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor During Endocrine Treatment in Hormone-Sensitive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in the Context of the COVID-19 Outbreak.

BACKGROUND: The impact of some hasty medical decision made during the first wave of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unknown. We have evaluated the consequences of one of these precautionary measures: the withdrawal of the cyclin D-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) in patients whose metastatic disease was controlled by a combination of endocrine treatment and CDK 4/6i. METHOD: This study was noninterventional, retrospective, multicentric, and included 60 patients with HR+ HER2- metastatic disease. Their disease was controlled with the combination of endocrine treatment and CDK 4/6i. The CDK 4/6i was stopped for two months during the first COVID-19 outbreak. A univariate analysis was performed to assess the risk factors associated with disease progression. RESULTS: During this therapeutic break, 22 (37 %) patients had a radiological and/or clinical disease progression. Among them, the CDK 4/6i was re-introduced to 16 patients (n = 16/22; 73 %). A new line of treatment (chemotherapy or targeted therapy) was initiated due to the rapid symptomatic tumor progression in four patients (n = 4/22; 18 %). Two patients (n = 2/22) died in visceral crisis before another anti-tumoral treatment was introduced. In univariate analysis, the presence of liver metastases increased the risk of metastatic disease progression during the withdrawal of the CDK 4/6 (OR = 6.6; 95 % CI 1.87-23.22; P= .0033). CONCLUSION: Progression was observed in 37% of patients during the two-month treatment interruption of the CDK 4/6i. A prolonged CDK 4/6i treatment interruption in patients with clinical benefit on endocrine treatment does not seem to be a reasonable option in light of these results.

Constitutive IFNα Protein Production in Bats.

Bats are the only mammals with self-powered flight and account for 20% of all extant mammalian diversity. In addition, they harbor many emerging and reemerging viruses, including multiple coronaviruses, several of which are highly pathogenic in other mammals, but cause no disease in bats. How this symbiotic relationship between bats and viruses exists is not yet fully understood. Existing evidence supports a specific role for the innate immune system, in particular type I interferon (IFN) responses, a major component of antiviral immunity. Previous studies in bats have shown that components of the IFN pathway are constitutively activated at the transcriptional level. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that the type I IFN response in bats is also constitutively activated at the protein level. For this, we utilized highly sensitive Single Molecule (Simoa) digital ELISA assays, previously developed for humans that we adapted to bat samples. We prospectively sampled four non-native chiroptera species from French zoos. We identified a constitutive expression of IFNα protein in the circulation of healthy bats, and concentrations that are physiologically active in humans. Expression levels differed according to the species examined, but were not associated with age, sex, or health status suggesting constitutive IFNα protein expression independent of disease. These results confirm a unique IFN response in bat species that may explain their ability to coexist with multiple viruses in the absence of pathology. These results may help to manage potential zoonotic viral reservoirs and potentially identify new anti-viral strategies.

Multicenter evaluation of breast cancer patients' satisfaction and experience with oncology telemedicine visits during the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, teleconsultation was implemented in clinical practice to limit patient exposure to COVID-19 while monitoring their treatment and follow-up. We sought to examine the satisfaction of patients with breast cancer (BC) who underwent teleconsultations during this period. METHODS: Eighteen centres in France and Italy invited patients with BC who had at least one teleconsultation during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic to participate in a web-based survey that evaluated their satisfaction (EORTC OUT-PATSAT 35 and Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire [TSQ] scores) with teleconsultation. RESULTS: Among the 1299 participants eligible for this analysis, 53% of participants were undergoing standard post-treatment follow-up while 22 and 17% were currently receiving active anticancer therapy for metastatic and localised cancers, respectively. The mean satisfaction scores were 77.4 and 73.3 for the EORTC OUT-PATSAT 35 and TSQ scores, respectively. In all, 52.6% of participants had low/no anxiety. Multivariable analysis showed that the EORTC OUT-PATSAT 35 score correlated to age, anxiety score and teleconsultation modality. The TSQ score correlated to disease status and anxiety score. CONCLUSION: Patients with BC were satisfied with oncology teleconsultations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Teleconsultation may be an acceptable alternative follow-up modality in specific circumstances.